2023年雅思考試模擬試題及答案（3） 1月4日雅思閱讀考試真題答案

最近經(jīng)常有小伙伴私信詢問(wèn)2023年雅思考試模擬試題及答案（3） 1月4日雅思閱讀考試真題答案相關(guān)的問(wèn)題，今天，大學(xué)路小編整理了以下內(nèi)容，希望可以對(duì)大家有所幫助。

本文目錄一覽：

• 1、2023年雅思考試模擬試題及答案（3）
• 2、2020年1月4日雅思閱讀考試真題答案
• 3、求大神批改雅思7 test3大作文，謝謝

2023年雅思考試模擬試題及答案（3）

您好，我是專注留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學(xué)夢(mèng)想的路上，選擇合適的學(xué)校和專業(yè)，準(zhǔn)備相關(guān)考試，都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的留學(xué)顧問(wèn)，我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導(dǎo)。歡迎隨時(shí)提問(wèn)！
小鐘老師為大家?guī)?lái)2023年雅思考試模擬試題及答案(3)，歡迎大家參考!更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)關(guān)注本站!
2023年雅思考試模擬試題及答案(3)
Lighting Up The Lies
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13 which are based on Reading Passage below.
Last year Sean A. Spence, a professor at the school of medicine at the University of Sheffield in England, performed brain scans that showed that a woman convicted of poisoning a child in her care appeared to be telling the truth when she denied committing the crime. This deception study, along with two others performed by the Sheffield group, was funded by Quickfire Media, a television production company working for the U.K.'s Channel 4, which broadcast videos of the researchers at work as part of a three-part series called "Lie Lab." The brain study of the woman later appeared in the journal European Psychiatry.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) purports to detect mendacity by seeing inside the brain instead of tracking peripheral measures of anxiety—such as changes in pulse, blood pressure or respiration —measured by a polygraph. Besides drawing hundreds of thousands of viewers, fMRI has pulled in entrepreneurs. Two companies—Cephos in Pepperell, Mass., and No Lie MRI in Tarzana, Calif.—claim to predict with 90 percent or greater certitude whether you are telling the truth. No Lie MRI, whose name evokes the casual familiarity of a walk-in dental clinic in a strip mall, suggests that the technique may even be used for “risk reduction in dating”.
Many neuroscientists and legal scholars doubt such claims—and some even question whether brain scans for lie detection will ever be ready for anything but more research on the nature of deception and the brain. An fMRI machine tracks blood flow to activated brain areas. The assumption in lie detection is that the brain must exert extra effort when telling a lie and that the regions that do more work get more blood. Such areas light up in scans; during the lie studies, the illuminated regions are primarily involved in decision making.
To assess how fMRI and other neuroscience findings affect the law, the Mac-Arthur Foundation put up $10 million last year to pilot for three years the Law and Neuroscience Project. Part of the funding will attempt to set criteria for accurate and reliable lie detection using fMRI and other brain-scanning technology. “I think it's not possible, given the current technology, to trust the results,” says Marcus Raichle, a neuroscientist at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis who heads the project's study group on lie detection. “But it’s not impossible to set up a research program to determine whether that’s possible.” A major review article last year in the American Journal of Law and Medicine by Henry T. Greely of Stanford University and Judy Illes, now at the University of British Columbia, explores the deficiencies of existing research and what may be needed to move the technology forward. The two scholars found that lie detection studies conducted so far (still less than 20 in all) failed to prove that fMRI is “effective as a lie detector in the real world at any accuracy level.”
Most studies examined groups, not individuals. Subjects in these studies were healthy young *s—making it unclear how the results would apply to someone who takes a drug that affects blood pressure or has a blockage in an artery. And the two researchers questioned the specificity of the lit-up areas; they noted that the regions also correlate with a wide range of cognitive behaviors, including memory, self- monitoring and conscious self-awareness.
The biggest challenge for which the Law and Neuroscience Project is already funding new research—is how to diminish the artificiality of the test protocol. Lying about whether a playing card is the seven of spades may not activate the same areas of the cortex as answering a question about whether you robbed the corner store. In fact, the most realistic studies to date may have come from the Lie Lab television programs. The two companies marketing the technology are not waiting for more data. Cephos is offering scans without charge to people who claim they were falsely accused if they meet certain criteria in an effort to get scans accepted by the courts. Allowing scans as legal evidence could open a potentially huge and lucrative market. “We may have to take many shots on goal before we actually see a courtroom.” says Cephos chief executive Steven Laken. He asserts that the technology has achieved 97 percent accuracy and that the more than 100 people scanned using the Cephos protocol have provided data that have resolved many of the issues that Greely and Illes cited.
But until formal clinical trials prove that the machines meet safety and effectiveness criteria, Greely and Illes have called for a ban on non-research uses. Trials envisaged for regulatory approval hint at the technical challenges. Actors, professional poker players and sociopaths would be compared against average Joes. The devout would go in the scanner after nonbelievers. Testing would take into account social setting. White lies—“no, dinner really was fantastic”—would have to be compared against untruths about sexual peccadilloes to ensure that the brain reacts identically.
There potential for abuse prompts caution. “The danger is that people’s lives can be changed in bad ways because of mistakes in the technology,” Greely says. “The danger for the science is that it gets a black eye because of this very high profile use of neuroimaging that goes wrong.” Considering the long and controversial history of the polygraph, graduali* may be the wisest course to follow for a new diagnostic that probes an essential quality governing social interaction.
Question 1-7
Use the information in the passage to match the people (listed A-D) with opinions or deeds below. Write the appropriate letters A-D in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.
NB you may use any letter more than once
A Henry T. Greely &Judy Illes
B Steven Laken
C Henry T. Greely
D Marcus Raichle
1 The possibility hidden in a mission impossible
2 The uncertain effectiveness of functional magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lies
3 The hazard lying behind the technology as a lie detector
4 The limited fields for the use of lie detection technology
5 Several successful cases of applying the results from the lie detection technology
6 Cons of the current research related to lie-detector tests
7 There should be some requested work to improve the techniques regarding lie detection
Question 8-10
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 8-10 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement is true
FALSE if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage
8 The lie detection for a convicted woman was first conducted by researchers in Europe.
9 The legitimization of using scans in the court might mean a promising and profitable business.
10 There is always something wrong with neuroimaging.
Question 11-13
Summary
Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage, using No More than Three words from the Reading Passage for each answer. Write your answers in boxes 11-13 on your answer sheet.
It is claimed that functional magnetic resonance imaging can check lies by observing the internal part of the brain rather than following up 11 to evaluate the anxiety as 12 does. Audiences as well as 13 are fascinated by this amazing lie-detection technology.
參考譯文：
去年，英國(guó)謝菲爾德大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院教授Sean A. Spence 在對(duì)一位將自己照顧的孩子毒死的婦女的大腦進(jìn)行掃描時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)，這位被定罪的婦女在否認(rèn)自己的犯罪事實(shí)時(shí)，看起來(lái)像是在說(shuō)真話。這項(xiàng)關(guān)于欺騙的研究，連同其它兩個(gè)由謝菲爾德小組領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的研究是由Quickfire Media贊助的，Quickfire Media是一家電視節(jié)目*公司，播出頻道為英國(guó)的第4頻道，該頻道播放這些研究人員在工作時(shí)的視頻，構(gòu)成一個(gè)由三部分組成的系列節(jié)目的一部分，該系列叫做“謊言實(shí)驗(yàn)室”。對(duì)該婦女大腦的研究之后出現(xiàn)在歐洲精神病學(xué)雜志上。
功能磁共振成像儀(fMRI)聲稱能通過(guò)看到大腦的內(nèi)部來(lái)進(jìn)行測(cè)謊，而不是通過(guò)追蹤焦慮的外在表現(xiàn):如通過(guò)測(cè)謊儀測(cè)出的脈搏，血壓或呼吸的變化，功能磁共振成像技術(shù)除了吸引成百上千的觀眾外，還吸引著企業(yè)家的目光。兩家公司——馬薩諸塞州Pepperell市的 Cephos 公司和加利福尼亞州Tarzana市的No Lie MRI 公司聲稱對(duì)人們是否在說(shuō)實(shí)話的預(yù)測(cè)的準(zhǔn)確率可以達(dá)到90%甚至更高。No Lie MRI 這家公司的名字本身就會(huì)讓人想起一個(gè)熟悉的情景——就像走進(jìn)一家位于商業(yè)區(qū)的牙科診所，表明該技術(shù)甚至可能被 用于“降低約會(huì)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)?！?
許多神經(jīng)科學(xué)家和法律學(xué)者卻懷疑此說(shuō)法，有的甚至質(zhì)疑對(duì)謊言的探測(cè)而進(jìn)行大腦掃描測(cè)謊是否真的有用，還是只是一些對(duì)謊言的性質(zhì)和大腦所做的更多的研究罷了。功能磁共振成像儀追蹤到達(dá)大腦激活區(qū)的血流的行蹤。測(cè)謊背后的假設(shè)是，當(dāng)大腦在說(shuō)謊時(shí)，它需要額外的運(yùn)作并且負(fù)責(zé)這些額外運(yùn)作的大腦區(qū)域需要更多的血液供給，而這些區(qū)域在被掃描時(shí)就會(huì)亮起，在對(duì)謊言進(jìn)行研究時(shí)，這些被照亮的區(qū)域就是主要參與決策的區(qū)域。
為了評(píng)估功能磁共振成像儀和其他神經(jīng)科學(xué)的發(fā)現(xiàn)如何影響法律，麥克阿瑟基金去年出資1,000萬(wàn)元來(lái)資助一個(gè)將耗時(shí)三年的“法律和神經(jīng)科學(xué)項(xiàng)目”。部分資金將會(huì)用來(lái)嘗試設(shè)置使用功能磁共振成像儀和其它腦部掃描技術(shù)來(lái)進(jìn)行測(cè)謊的準(zhǔn)確性和可靠性的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。華盛頓大學(xué)圣路易斯醫(yī)學(xué)院負(fù)責(zé)該項(xiàng)目測(cè)謊研究小組的神經(jīng)學(xué)家 Marcus Raichle 認(rèn)為“在現(xiàn)有的技術(shù)前提下，很難完全相信測(cè)謊的結(jié)果，但是建立一個(gè)項(xiàng)目以確定測(cè)謊結(jié)果的可能性這項(xiàng)提議是可行的?！彼固垢４髮W(xué)的 Henry T. Greely 和英國(guó)哥倫比亞大學(xué)的 Judy Illes 在去年發(fā)表在美國(guó)《法律與醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》上的一篇評(píng)論文章中探討了現(xiàn)行研究的不足之處以及為了推進(jìn)技術(shù)進(jìn)步可能需要改進(jìn)之處。兩位學(xué)者發(fā)現(xiàn)，迄今為止進(jìn)行的測(cè)謊研究(總數(shù)仍低于20)還不能證明磁共振成像儀作為測(cè)謊儀在現(xiàn)實(shí)世界中的任何的精度水平上都是有效的。
大多數(shù)的研究都是以團(tuán)體而不是以個(gè)人為對(duì)象。這些研究的對(duì)象是健康的年輕成年人——所以不清楚如果對(duì)象變成因?yàn)榉昧怂幬锒绊懥搜獕夯蚴菍?dǎo)致動(dòng)脈堵塞的人時(shí)，這些研究結(jié)果是否還適用。兩位研究人員質(zhì)疑了這些發(fā)亮的區(qū)域，他們指出，該區(qū)域也和一系列認(rèn)知行為具有相關(guān)性，包括記憶，自我檢測(cè)和自我意識(shí)。
最大的挑戰(zhàn)——同時(shí)也是“法律和神經(jīng)枓學(xué)項(xiàng)目”為其資助了新的研究項(xiàng)目——是如何減少測(cè)試協(xié)議的人為干預(yù)程度。關(guān)于一張撲克牌是否是黑桃7的謊言可能無(wú)法激活與回答你是否搶劫了街角的一家商店時(shí)的大腦皮質(zhì)的同一區(qū)域。事實(shí)上，迄今為止最現(xiàn)實(shí)的研究，有可能是來(lái)自“謊言實(shí)驗(yàn)室”這個(gè)電視節(jié)目。兩家經(jīng)營(yíng)這樣技術(shù)的公司不是再等待更多的數(shù)據(jù)。Cephos公司提供的免費(fèi)的掃描是針對(duì)一些符合特定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)由法院準(zhǔn)許的聲稱自己是無(wú)罪的人。允許對(duì)大腦的掃描作為法律證據(jù)可能會(huì)打開(kāi)一個(gè)潛在的巨大和利潤(rùn)豐厚的市場(chǎng)。Cephos公司的首席執(zhí)行官Steven Laken說(shuō)道“在上法庭之前，可能需要進(jìn)行若干的測(cè)試”。他聲稱該技術(shù)已達(dá)到97%的準(zhǔn)確率，并且有超過(guò)100個(gè)使用Cephos公司掃描的人已經(jīng)通過(guò)獲得數(shù)據(jù)解決了許多Greely and Illes提到過(guò)的問(wèn)題。
但是，Greely 和 Illes的呼吁在正式的臨床試驗(yàn)證明該儀器能夠滿足安全性和有效性的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)前，該儀器不可用在非研究領(lǐng)域。要面對(duì)監(jiān)管部門的批準(zhǔn)的試驗(yàn)要面對(duì)技術(shù)上的挑戰(zhàn)。演員，專業(yè)撲克玩家和反社會(huì)的人會(huì)和普通人進(jìn)行比較。虔誠(chéng)的人會(huì)跟在懷疑論者的后面接受掃描。測(cè)試將需要考慮到社會(huì)環(huán)境。善意的謊言——“不，晚餐真是太棒了”——將會(huì)和有關(guān)性過(guò)失這樣的謊言進(jìn)行比對(duì)，以保證大腦對(duì)不同的謊言有相同的反應(yīng)。
人們要小心這項(xiàng)技術(shù)被濫用的危險(xiǎn)。Greely 認(rèn)為“危險(xiǎn)在于人們的生活可能會(huì)因?yàn)榧夹g(shù)中的錯(cuò)誤往不好的方向改變?？茖W(xué)的危險(xiǎn)之處在于它有很多未知性，因?yàn)樗艽蟪潭壬鲜褂昧隋e(cuò)誤的神經(jīng)影像學(xué)。”鑒于漫長(zhǎng)且有爭(zhēng)議的測(cè)謊儀的歷史，循序漸進(jìn)可能是最明智的選擇，來(lái)使用它作為一個(gè)新的診斷手段來(lái)檢測(cè)社會(huì)治理的質(zhì)量。

希望以上的答復(fù)能對(duì)您的留學(xué)申請(qǐng)有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細(xì)的問(wèn)題或需要進(jìn)一步的協(xié)助，我強(qiáng)烈推薦您訪問(wèn)我們的留學(xué)官方網(wǎng)站 ，在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)資料以及*的咨詢服務(wù)。祝您留學(xué)申請(qǐng)順利！

2020年1月4日雅思閱讀考試真題答案

2020年的第一次雅思考試已經(jīng)圓滿結(jié)束了，真題和答案也已經(jīng)新鮮出爐，大家考得怎么樣呢？為大家準(zhǔn)備了2020年1月4日雅思閱讀考試真題答案。

考試概述

本場(chǎng)閱讀考試3篇文章中匹配題考查較多，對(duì)考生的做題速度要求較高。

Passage 1

文章題材：說(shuō)明文（生物科學(xué)）

文章題目：山雀

文章難度：★★★

文章內(nèi)容：待補(bǔ)充

題型及數(shù)量：填空+判斷

參考答案：待補(bǔ)充

可參考真題：劍橋12——TEST7 Passage1 Flying tortoises

Passage 2

文章題材：說(shuō)明文（人文社科）

文章題目：講故事的演進(jìn)

文章難度：★★★

文章內(nèi)容：待補(bǔ)充

題型及數(shù)量：填空+選擇

參考答案：待補(bǔ)充

可參考真題：劍橋7——TEST3Passage2 Population Movements and Genetics

Passage 3

文章題材：說(shuō)明文（人文社科）

文章題目：現(xiàn)代科技

文章難度：★★★

文章內(nèi)容：待補(bǔ)充

題型及數(shù)量：匹配題+填空

參考答案：待補(bǔ)充

可參考真題：劍橋9——TEST3 Passage3 Information Theory – the big idea

話題詞

科技發(fā)展類

1. tran*ission 傳播

2. omit 忽略

3. incident 事件

4. distort 變形

5. overcome 克服

6. instrument 設(shè)備

7. statistics 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)

8. pioneer 先驅(qū)

9. manage to do sth. 成功地做某事

10. prestigious 有名望的

同義替換詞

1. follow/track/tail 跟隨，跟蹤

2. teach/educate/train/coach/instruct 教學(xué)

3. differ from/unusual/distinguish/recognize/identify 區(qū)別；與…不同

4. consult/ask somebody＇s advice咨詢

5. explain/tell/show/demonstrate /throw/shed light on 解釋

6. occur/happen/take place/turn up 發(fā)生

7. expand/get bigger/grow/swell up/stretch 擴(kuò)張，擴(kuò)大

8. emerge/appear/become visible/come into view/come into sight/come out 出現(xiàn)

9. generate/produce/manufacture 生產(chǎn)

10. predict/anticipate/forecast/foretell/expect 預(yù)測(cè)；預(yù)期

求大神批改雅思7 test3大作文，謝謝

1. 第二行therefore換成so才好。therefore一般用于至少經(jīng)過(guò)簡(jiǎn)短 論述/論證 (而不是簡(jiǎn)單的 陳述 )之后。

2. 第二段第一句中到底用can還是may需要斟酌。通常作“可以”解時(shí)，can強(qiáng)調(diào)“能夠”側(cè)重 能力 ，may強(qiáng)調(diào)“可能”側(cè)重 可能性 。

3.Firstly、Secondly后面接的是短語(yǔ)而Thirdly后面接的是句子，建議改成統(tǒng)一的結(jié)構(gòu)。同時(shí)，建議將第二段第一句獨(dú)立成段，F(xiàn)irstly…、Secondly…、Thirdly…各成一段，這樣不僅層次分明，而且firstly、secondly、thirdly后面的結(jié)構(gòu)也更清晰。

4.第二段第5行considerable改成important，或改成considerably后加important；單詞find改成look for.

5.Thirdly后面的also后移至should后面；下一句relationship前加上good.

6.本段倒數(shù)第二行中,in that case,改成so that.若保持原詞匯不動(dòng)，則要獨(dú)立成句。

7. 下一段第一句中opponents其實(shí)用people會(huì)更自然，realistic用reasonable更貼切。下一句many of them中them用得不好，應(yīng)該用many people( 泛指有許多人 ) 或many of the people (特指前面那些人中的許多人)。再下一句job改成jobs、family改成families.

8.最后一句的主句邏輯上存在問(wèn)題，因?yàn)锳 company doesn't have any responsibilities for providing people with acceptable jobs , neither does it have to make effort to enssure anything of the kind. The only thing it has to do is to hire competent people and better the welfare of its employees .

以上就是大學(xué)路小編整理的內(nèi)容，想要了解更多相關(guān)資訊內(nèi)容敬請(qǐng)關(guān)注大學(xué)路。